suspicious locals during focus group interview |
How can I
make my interviewees speak if I even do not know the language and sit quiet
like an ameba most of the time?
How can I
make this research interesting for them? Last time I did several short
interviews and they seemed to be far less from OK. I worked for few years in
the journalist group, also for my studies I conducted so many interviews with
very different people in different languages-and trust me, I really know how to
make them. I thought I could “open” everyone simply because during the talk I
become so fascinated by this person, almost like falling in love. Obviously,
this encouraged another person a lot and the conversation rose very
successfully, often going over time limits. However, now I fail. I hate myself
for not being able to talk without the translator and without feeling them,
like I always do. Only once, hearing a case of a mother crying for her son to
disappear somewhere abroad, my sadness did not know its borders and the woman
felt it. She didn’t want to talk to us at the beginning, but once she started
she could see my feelings getting so close to hers, supporting and crying, just
like I would quietly hold the hand of my best friend at her worst moments of
life. At that moment the translator was not needed any more, when he was
translating my words, the woman just said-I know, I can feel that.
Apart from
that their words remain just words and never come close to my mind and soul. By
writing their answers I can easily mix the people in my mind, feeling betraying
their life stories.
How can I
talk to them and let them talk to me? Shall I just rely on time? Even if I
manage to build trust, confidence and friendship, this place is so scarce, that
I would need to repeat the same long process of building trust many many times.
Today I
came to talk to young people in the school. I talked twice and the first talk
was a total disaster. The group of young boys would sit and don’t make any
sound, trying to avoid an eye contact, trying not to look at me and mostly
having their eyes down. It felt like I am here to punish them and they are just
sitting at the principal’s office, making the impression that they acknowledge
their fault. The second talk was easier, we arranged sitting on the ground,
being more equal and more informal. I started with a small introduction game
and explained myself with more jokes. When I finished and said to ask
questions, there was a deep silence. This time I’ve decided not to let it be
like that, so I divided them in 4 groups and asked to discuss with the 2 other
people questions. It actually worked, slowly questions started to come. Girls
shyer and not willing to say anything, but later they were interested in me
more than in what I am doing. Fair enough, I just wanted them to be active.
They sort of expressed their willingness to help, but we also have agreed that
we meet tomorrow and two people will arrange everyone to come at the same hour.
Now I am
sitting waiting for the next meeting to present myself and wondering-where am I
getting involved?! Willing to do the research I am actually taking the role of
a youth worker, trying to teach those kids not to be quiet, to discuss, to
share, to change their thinking and behaving habits. Who am I to do that? Do I
have rights to do that, to intervene in this community, living its own rhythm
and doing it quiet well? Why would I need to introduce western standards of
youth empowerment? Noone asked me here to come and no one said they need what I
am doing here. Shall I step out before it is too late? What if that is too hard
and will take all my time without any success?
thank you for documenting your stay. i'll be in nepal this february, will be there for the entire month. looking forward to it :)
ReplyDelete